The question posed is would I fly single pilot IFR? The short of the answer is not right now. Am I current? Yes. Am I proficient? No. Thats the most basic reason I have for my current answer.
However, I have done it before and I must say that even flying an approach I had flown several times before became a sobering experience when I was alone the clouds. Coming Back from a flight to College Station, TX there was a forecast for a band of clouds that would move in from the south across the area, but was not forecast to effect my destination of Sugar land Regional Airport. When I departed, Sugar Land was still forecasting scattered clouds at 1000ft, a common occurrence in the area. But as with any flight forecast things were bound to change. Between the time I left College Station, and arrived over the Eagle Lake VOR a layer of clouds from about 700-1000agl to 2400ft had pushed north over my route, but it looked like sugar land was still beyond their edge. So I tuned up the awos only to find out unfortunately that was not the case. My next call was to Montgomery CO FSS to see if any of my usual alternates were going to work. The Informed me that The clouds were pushing to the north earlier than expected. I knew a diversion would most likely take me north to Brenham. So feeling confident fresh off my instrument rating and flying another G1000 equipped c172, I decided to file a pop-up for the Runway 35 ILS into Sugar Land. Charts in hand, I called the ever helpful Houston Approach and made my request, they gave me a squawk code and cleared me to fly the approach as published continuing inbound from the eagle lake VOR. Thinking ahead, I was already setup from the VOR, and had the approach briefed and in the gps. I ran the descent checklist and, reduced power and sank down into the clouds to 2200ft. 10 minutes, and a hand off to Sugar Land Tower, later I reached Hull NDB and a southbound turn. I had been monitoring the awos and the ceiling was varying from 700ft to 1000ft. A margin of at least 500 ft above minimums was a reassuring thought as I reached HULLO intersection and dropped another 200ft. I made the procedure turn, came down to 1800ft, and called Tower to report catching the glide-slope inbound. Just like every time before I kept scanning, kept the needles mostly pegged. Somewhere around 900ft I noticed the cockpit get brighter and looked up to see home at 12 o'clock. After an uneventful landing, I thought about my decisions, actions, and why everything went as smoothly as it did.
1. I was recently current, and very proficient. If It had been 3-4 months since my last approach I would have headed for Brenham and not even considered trying an approach.
2. I was familiar, and very comfortable with the airplane. I was flying the same setup I used for all my instrument training. If I was flying steam gauges, once again I would have made a different decision.
3. I was familiar with the area and the procedures. I had practiced every approach into Sugar Land multiple times, I knew what was coming, and I knew the missed approach procedures.
Those 3 things are my personal big issues when it comes to flying single pilot IFR, if any of them are in question I would not risk flying into the clouds alone.
As for the article, the most interesting thing I read was the section on the use of non-pilot's as a resource. Most of us see our front seat passengers as strangers in a strange land that we have to keep off the controls and away from the switches. However, it's apparent that in high workload scenarios that a passenger could become a huge asset for keeping track of charts and performing other low complexity tasks.
No comments:
Post a Comment